Case Study
Friday, June 30
09:30 AM - 10:00 AM
Live in San Francisco
Less Details
The topic of a holistic safety case for an on-road Autonomous Vehicle (AV) is increasingly being discussed in the AV community and on the side of legislators. At the same time, laws and regulations for AVs are stepping up, and AV manufacturers are seeking guidance regarding the process of building and validating systems that fulfil all legal requirements and are safe enough. However, in the USA, amongst others, there is no single source of information or starting point to provide that guidance, and a clear definition of what constitutes “safe enough” is lacking, giving room for the state-of-the-art argument. To add more to the confusion, mandatory state laws can be vague and diverse regarding technical aspects, safety case requirements, and liability questions.This presentation gives an overview of industry standards and laws that apply to holistic safety cases for on-road AVs and discusses essential elements for such safety cases. The audience will:
Dr. Ruben Strenzke, M.Comp.Sc., is working as Senior Functional Safety Engineer for Highly-Automated Driving at TÜV SÜD America. Before collecting 3 years of experience as Systems Engineering Lead in different Robotaxi and Yard-Truck Autonomy projects (UD Trucks/Isuzu, Motional/Aptiv), he performed research and Systems Engineering in the field of Unmanned Aerial Systems and Autonomous Underwater Vehicles for 11 years (NATO, Airbus, Bundeswehr University Munich). This included 5 years in human factors research. Besides teleoperation, his main interest lies in behavioral requirements for Autonomous Vehicles, and relating to that he helped Singapore's Land Traffic Authority to write the Technical Reference TR 68.